How to talk about immigration without being a xenophobe
It is a fact that a substantial proportion of people in Ireland are of Irish descent.
Yet there are those who refuse to embrace that fact, as well as those who are very much in favour of the idea that Irish people should be welcomed with open arms, or at least with the same respect as other people.
That is the situation in Northern Ireland.
The Northern Irish issue was put to a vote in a recent referendum, which saw a majority of voters in favour.
But the debate has taken a strange turn since then.
In the run up to the referendum, the DUP made a series of statements about the nature of the border and how the border would be controlled.
One of them, in particular, provoked an angry response from the Unionist Party.
DUP leader Arlene Foster said that the Unionists were “not in favour” of the Border Commissioner’s office being open to the public and that the Government was planning to impose a ban on public gatherings in the Republic of Ireland.
This statement by Foster was interpreted as an invitation to the community to go out into the country and “confront” the Commissioner.
And in doing so, she made it clear that the community could be considered “in the UK”, or indeed any other country, for that matter.
This prompted an angry reaction from the British Labour Party and, by extension, the Conservative Party, who argued that such statements were a betrayal of the community’s wishes and should be taken down from public records.
So what did the UK do?
The UK did what it always does when faced with a serious breach of the EU’s external borders: it acted.
The Home Secretary, Theresa May, ordered the Commissioner’s Office to close its doors, and the DUP responded by threatening to do the same.
In response, the UK Government responded by saying that they would consider any legal action against the DUP, which is what the British government did when it announced that the UK would be withdrawing from the European Convention on Human Rights.
So the question is this: should the UK be prepared to be called upon to take legal action if its government is unable to effectively enforce its own internal border?
The answer is no.
The UK cannot effectively control its internal borders.
That cannot be said of the Republic.
The EU has a number of internal laws, the Common External Border Management Policy, that it has the right to impose on member states in the event of a border breach.
This includes the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the Human Rights Act of 1973, the European Charter of the Rights and Freedoms, and its Regulation of Electronic Communications (ECEC) Directive.
These laws, and all of the other EU laws and regulations that govern EU citizens, do not affect Northern Ireland or Northern Irish nationals.
The only way the EU can stop Northern Ireland from being closed to Irish people is to make Northern Ireland part of the UK.
However, that is not to say that Northern Ireland is not entitled to the same rights as any other member state.
The EU has the authority to limit access to its internal markets in certain circumstances, and this includes the border.
In particular, it is within the EU to set conditions on its internal market for citizens of third countries.
But that is the problem.
If the border is closed, there will be no other option.
And there is no alternative.
This is not the time for the EU or Northern Ireland to act like a state, where its citizens and citizens of other states are forced to abide by EU laws.
The only way that the EU and Northern Ireland can have a relationship with Northern Ireland in the long term is through an agreement that would be based on the Common Position Document (CPD), which is an agreement between the UK and the EU on border management.
The CPD is a legally binding agreement between member states and the UK that lays down rules on the use of the external borders in Northern Europe.
This agreement is not meant to give Northern Ireland any sort of veto over the UK’s internal borders, but it does address the border situation.
The British Government has agreed to the CPD, which lays down some guidelines for the use and control of the internal borders and for the exercise of sovereignty over Northern Ireland by the UK in relation to those borders.
It is possible for the UK to use the CPs to set limits on the movement of people within the country, such as the Border Restriction Orders (BROs), which allow the UK Border Agency to restrict the movement and movement of persons who are within its borders.
However, the only way for the Border Agency in relation of the Northern Irish border to be in effect is to be a state.
To be clear, there is a huge amount of debate over how the UK should control its borders, and it is therefore important to make clear that there is some agreement on what that means.
Northern Ireland has a very different approach to controlling its borders than does the UK, and so, the current arrangement is the only